open search
close betriebswahl 2022
Internationales Arbeitsrecht

UK – EU Commission confirms its views on EWCs and a ‘no-deal’ Brexit

The European Commission (‘EC’) has recently revised its March 2018 guidance on the legal repercussions of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU for European Works Councils (‘EWCs’), including the implications of a ‘no-deal’ Brexit.

The EC’s Notice to Stakeholders of 13 March 2019 does not have any formal legal status, but will be persuasive in any dispute. It confirms the analysis in our recent article on the impact of Brexit on EWCs currently governed by UK law. In summary, the EC considers that a no-deal Brexit would have the following consequences:

1. The EWC Directive will cease to apply to the UK. If a corporate group will cease to have 1,000 employees in EU member states then, even if a EWC is already established, the group will cease to be subject to the Directive (although the EWC may continue to exist under national law).

2. UK employees may continue to be represented on a EWC if that is provided for in the EWC agreement.

3. If a corporate group’s central management or representative agent is currently in the UK, the role of central management will be transferred to an EU member state. Unless central management’s ultimate parent company has designated a new representative agent in a member state, this role will be assumed by the establishment or group undertaking employing the greatest number of employees in a member state. This responsibility is transferred automatically and immediately as of the UK withdrawal date.

4. The law applicable to a EWC agreement is that of the member state where the central management, deemed central management or central management’s representative agent is situated in the EU. So where UK law has applied to an existing EWC, as of the withdrawal date, the law of a remaining member state will apply automatically and immediately. This is to ensure that the rights of employees in remaining member states remain enforceable.

5. The EC’s Notice therefore confirms that, even in the event of a no-deal Brexit, EWCs will continue to exist and operate so as to ensure that the rights of employees in remaining EU member states are not prejudiced. It also supports our advice that management should proactively designate a new representative agent in a remaining EU member state, in order to avoid governing law based solely on headcount numbers on an arbitrary date in the future.

106 beiträge

Ius Laboris

Ius Laboris is a leading international employment law practice combining the world’s leading employment, labour and pension firms. Our role lies in sharing insights and helping clients to navigate the world of labour and employment law successfully.
Verwandte Beiträge
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

UK launches national disability strategy

The UK government has published its promised national disability strategy setting out various steps it will take to remove barriers faced by disabled people in their lives. This article looks at the main work-related measures. The background In the latest Family Resources Survey  (2019/20), over 14 million people in the UK (one in five) reported a disability, which was an increase of 2.7 million since 2009 to…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Coronavirus survey: how are UK employers responding to ‘Freedom Day’?

Ius Laboris UK firm Lewis Silkin have surveyed employers on how they are responding to the lifting of lockdown restrictions: many are maintaining a cautious approach. This was a pulse survey carried out between 19 and 21 July involving 59 HR leaders and in-house counsel in a cross-section of businesses collectively employing over 400,000 employees. The survey confirms that employers are taking a cautious approach…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge United Kingdom

Gender critical beliefs are considered as philosophical beliefs in the UK

The UK Employment Appeal Tribunal has ruled that ‘gender critical’ beliefs are protected philosophical beliefs for equality law purposes, while confirming that a belief in ‘gender identity’ is also a protected characteristic. This means that it is unlawful to discriminate against someone because they do or do not hold either of those beliefs. Background to the case Maya Forstater was a consultant for CGD Europe, a not-for-profit…
Abonnieren Sie den KLIEMT-Newsletter.
Jetzt anmelden und informiert bleiben.

Die Abmeldung ist jederzeit möglich.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.